NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 210 Watt vs 365 Watt
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 3800 MHz vs 1707 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.324 vs 30.921
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1181.463 vs 1116.126
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.978 vs 3.799
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.37 vs 49.114
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.575 vs 107.239
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 vs 4118
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 vs 4118
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 November 2011 vs 24 March 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt vs 365 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz vs 1707 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 vs 30.921 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 vs 1116.126 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 vs 3.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 vs 49.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 vs 107.239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 vs 4118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 vs 4118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 3330 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 732 MHz
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 77.7 billion / sec vs 41.0 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 448
- Around 90% better floating-point performance: 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 1,311.7 gflops
- 2.4x more maximum memory size: 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) vs 1280 MB
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2133
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2133
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 732 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 77.7 billion / sec vs 41.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 448 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 1,311.7 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) vs 1280 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 2133 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 | 30.921 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 | 1116.126 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 | 3.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 | 49.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 | 107.239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 | 4118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2133 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 | 4118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2133 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3330 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4197 | 0 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12830 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GF110 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 29 November 2011 | 24 March 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | $699 |
| Place in performance rating | 766 | 768 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $184 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 30.41 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,311.7 gflops | 2x 1,244.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 448 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 41.0 GTexel / s | 77.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt | 365 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | Two 8-pin |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | Quad | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB / s | 327.7 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
| Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz | 1707 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V3200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 590
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM
