NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 versus NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1215 MHz versus 574 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 77.7 billion / sec versus 32.1 GTexel / s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 448
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 1,244.2 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 versus 2685
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12811 versus 9845
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.921 versus 24.377
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1116.126 versus 793.755
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.799 versus 2.66
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.114 versus 34.891
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.239 versus 90.839
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4118 versus 3501
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4118 versus 3501
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 24 March 2011 versus 10 December 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz versus 574 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.7 billion / sec versus 32.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 448 |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 1,244.2 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 versus 2685 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12811 versus 9845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 versus 24.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 versus 793.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 versus 2.66 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 versus 34.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.239 versus 90.839 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4118 versus 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4118 versus 3501 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 6000
- Environ 79% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 204 Watt versus 365 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
- Environ 75% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2988 MHz versus 1707 MHz
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 446 versus 394
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt versus 365 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2988 MHz versus 1707 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 446 versus 394 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 versus 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 versus 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 versus 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 versus 3330 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 | 2685 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 | 446 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12811 | 9845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 | 24.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 | 793.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 | 2.66 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 | 34.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.239 | 90.839 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4118 | 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4118 | 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF110 | GF100 |
Date de sortie | 24 March 2011 | 10 December 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $4,399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 789 | 791 |
Prix maintenant | $184 | $332.21 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 30.41 | 12.86 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz | 574 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 1,244.2 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.7 billion / sec | 32.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 365 Watt | 204 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) | 248 mm |
Options SLI | Quad | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 327.7 GB / s | 143.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1707 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |