NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 61% higher core clock speed: 824 MHz vs 513 MHz
• Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 39.55 GTexel / s vs 22.57 GTexel / s
• Around 64% higher pipelines: 576 vs 352
• Around 31% better floating-point performance: 949.2 gflops vs 722.3 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 152 Watt
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 428 vs 391
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.51 vs 511.131
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.524 vs 17.065
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 vs 3104
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 vs 3104

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000

• 2.5x more maximum memory size: 2560 MB vs 1 GB
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1958 vs 1883
• Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7339 vs 5202
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.451 vs 13.806
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.925 vs 1.535
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 46.591 vs 38.664
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2602 vs 1435
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2602 vs 1435

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1883 1958
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	428 391
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5202 7339
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.806 16.451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	546.51 511.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.535 1.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.524 17.065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.664 46.591
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1435 2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3531 3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3300 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1435 2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3531 3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3300 3316

Compare specifications (specs)