NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM versus NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 61% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 824 MHz versus 513 MHz
- Environ 75% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 39.55 GTexel / s versus 22.57 GTexel / s
- Environ 64% de pipelines plus haut: 576 versus 352
- Environ 31% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 949.2 gflops versus 722.3 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 152 Watt
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 3000 MHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 428 versus 391
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.51 versus 511.131
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.524 versus 17.065
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 versus 3104
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 versus 3104
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 April 2013 versus 23 February 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 824 MHz versus 513 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.55 GTexel / s versus 22.57 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 576 versus 352 |
| Performance á point flottant | 949.2 gflops versus 722.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 152 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 3000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 versus 391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.51 versus 511.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.524 versus 17.065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3531 versus 3104 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3531 versus 3104 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 5000
- 2.5x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2560 MB versus 1 GB
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1958 versus 1883
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7339 versus 5202
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.451 versus 13.806
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.925 versus 1.535
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 46.591 versus 38.664
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2602 versus 1435
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2602 versus 1435
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2560 MB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1958 versus 1883 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7339 versus 5202 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.451 versus 13.806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.925 versus 1.535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 46.591 versus 38.664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2602 versus 1435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3316 versus 3300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2602 versus 1435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3316 versus 3300 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1883 | 1958 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 | 391 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5202 | 7339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.806 | 16.451 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.51 | 511.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.535 | 1.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.524 | 17.065 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.664 | 46.591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1435 | 2602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3531 | 3104 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3300 | 3316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1435 | 2602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3531 | 3104 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3300 | 3316 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK106 | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 22 April 2013 | 23 February 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 968 | 970 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
| Prix maintenant | $268 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.71 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 824 MHz | 513 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 949.2 gflops | 722.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 576 | 352 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.55 GTexel / s | 22.57 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 152 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 147 mm | 248 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2560 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 120.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 645 OEM vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1100 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 645 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 645 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000D
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 645 OEM vs
NVIDIAGRID K2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 645 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 645 OEM vs
AMDFirePro W4100
