NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD FirePro V7900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and AMD FirePro V7900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 58.0 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 134 Watt vs 151 Watt
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3368 vs 2305
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 461 vs 336
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 vs 14.134
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 vs 1.309
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3426 vs 2996
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 vs 2996

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V7900

• Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 1,856.0 gflops vs 1,585 gflops
• 833.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27733 vs 9549
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 676.409 vs 561.43
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.678 vs 30.868
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.25 vs 51.009
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3642
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3242
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3642
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3242

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V7900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3368 2305
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	461 336
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9549 27733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.21 14.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	561.43 676.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.026 1.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.868 36.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	51.009 171.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3642 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3642 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 3354

Compare specifications (specs)