NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 888 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
| Launch date | 26 March 2013 vs 22 August 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 823 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 888 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 62.7 billion / sec
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 768
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 1,585 gflops
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 134 Watt
- 933.3x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.718 vs 25.21
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 vs 561.43
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 vs 2.026
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 vs 30.868
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.697 vs 51.009
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 vs 3426
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3665 vs 3642
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 3242
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 vs 3426
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3665 vs 3642
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 3242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s vs 62.7 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops vs 1,585 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 134 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.718 vs 25.21 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1021.371 vs 561.43 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.143 vs 2.026 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 56.509 vs 30.868 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.697 vs 51.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5983 vs 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3665 vs 3642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 3242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5983 vs 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3665 vs 3642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 3242 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3351 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9566 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | 32.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | 1021.371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | 3.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | 56.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | 67.697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK106 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 26 March 2013 | 22 August 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Place in performance rating | 836 | 839 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | 888 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 823 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1152 |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec | 85.25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 5600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon HD 7790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon HD 8210E
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDFirePro S9300 X2
