NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 732 MHz
• Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 43.92 GTexel / s
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 768 vs 480
• Around 13% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 134 Watt vs 219 Watt
• Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

• 633.3x more memory clock speed: 3800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.499 vs 25.21
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 708.853 vs 561.43
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.967 vs 2.026
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.208 vs 30.868
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 123.354 vs 51.009
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5405 vs 3426
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3642
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3242
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5405 vs 3426
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3642
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3242

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.21 36.499
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	561.43 708.853
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.026 3.967
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.868 36.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	51.009 123.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 5405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3642 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 5405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3642 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 3357

Compare specifications (specs)