NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 732 MHz
- Environ 43% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 62.7 billion / sec versus 43.92 GTexel / s
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 480
- Environ 13% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,585 gflops versus 1,405 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 63% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 134 Watt versus 219 Watt
- Environ 60% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1280 MB
Date de sortie | 26 March 2013 versus 7 December 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 732 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.7 billion / sec versus 43.92 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 480 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,585 gflops versus 1,405 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt versus 219 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1280 MB |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
- 633.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3800 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.499 versus 25.21
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 708.853 versus 561.43
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.967 versus 2.026
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.208 versus 30.868
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 123.354 versus 51.009
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5405 versus 3426
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 versus 3642
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3242
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5405 versus 3426
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 versus 3642
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3242
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3800 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.499 versus 25.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 708.853 versus 561.43 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.967 versus 2.026 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.208 versus 30.868 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 123.354 versus 51.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5405 versus 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 3642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5405 versus 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 3642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3242 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3375 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 464 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9529 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | 36.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | 708.853 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | 3.967 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | 36.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | 123.354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | 5405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | 5405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK106 | GF110 |
Date de sortie | 26 March 2013 | 7 December 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | $349 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 815 | 818 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 732 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,585 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.7 billion / sec | 43.92 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | 219 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 3,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1280 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 320 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | 3800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |