NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 134 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 416.7x more memory clock speed: 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9741 vs 9529
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 vs 25.21
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.54 vs 2.026
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.412 vs 30.868
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.158 vs 51.009
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 vs 3426
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3642
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3242
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 vs 3426
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3642
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3242
• 3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3350 vs 1106

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 914 MHz
• Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 44.96 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• Around 10% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 1,439 gflops
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3375 vs 2580
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 464 vs 217
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 vs 373.644

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2580 3375
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	217 464
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9741 9529
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.396 25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	373.644 561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.54 2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.412 30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.158 51.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4148 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4148 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3242
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 1106

Compare specifications (specs)