NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 823 MHz
• Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 52.7 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• Around 25% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 134 Watt vs 170 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3375 vs 3060
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 464 vs 436
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 vs 539.966
• 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 vs 389

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

• 668x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10720 vs 9529
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.935 vs 25.21
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.344 vs 2.026
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.841 vs 30.868
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 64.308 vs 51.009
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4184 vs 3426
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3642
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3242
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4184 vs 3426
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3642
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3242

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3375 3060
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	464 436
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9529 10720
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.21 31.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	561.43 539.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.026 2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.868 35.841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	51.009 64.308
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3642 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3642 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1106 389

Compare specifications (specs)