NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon HD 7450M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and AMD Radeon HD 7450M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

AMD Radeon HD 7450M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 40% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 700 MHz
11.2x more texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 5.6 GTexel / s
4.8x more pipelines: 768 vs 160
7.1x better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 224.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
10.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3375 vs 330
Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 464 vs 441
20x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9529 vs 476
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 1832
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 1832

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	26 March 2013 vs 7 January 2012
Core clock speed	980 MHz vs 700 MHz
Texture fill rate	62.7 billion / sec vs 5.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 160
Floating-point performance	1,585 gflops vs 224.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3375 vs 330
PassMark - G2D Mark	464 vs 441
Geekbench - OpenCL	9529 vs 476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3642 vs 1832
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3642 vs 1832

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450M

19.1x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 134 Watt
300x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3493 vs 3242
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3493 vs 3242

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	7 Watt vs 134 Watt
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3493 vs 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3493 vs 3242

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7450M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3375

330

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

464

441

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9529

476

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3642

1832

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3242

3493

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3642

1832

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3242

3493

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost	AMD Radeon HD 7450M
PassMark - G3D Mark	3375	330
PassMark - G2D Mark	464	441
Geekbench - OpenCL	9529	476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	51.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3642	1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3242	3493
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3642	1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3242	3493
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1106

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost	AMD Radeon HD 7450M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Code name	GK106	Seymour
Launch date	26 March 2013	7 January 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$169
Place in performance rating	815	816
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1033 MHz
Core clock speed	980 MHz	700 MHz
CUDA cores	768
Floating-point performance	1,585 gflops	224.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C
Pipelines	768	160
Texture fill rate	62.7 billion / sec	5.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	134 Watt	7 Watt
Transistor count	2,540 million	370 million
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...	No outputs
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	9.5" (24.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	One 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.3	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	144.2 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6.0 GB/s	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA