NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 6450A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 6450A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 11.8x more texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 768 vs 160
- 7.1x better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 200 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 9.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 260
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 208
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 October 2012 vs 7 April 2011 |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops vs 200 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 vs 260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 vs 208 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6450A
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 213.2x more memory clock speed: 1066 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1066 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6450A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6450A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 | 260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 | 208 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7900 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6450A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK106 | Caicos |
Launch date | 9 October 2012 | 7 April 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Place in performance rating | 846 | 847 |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 625 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops | 200 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 8.53 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 1066 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |