NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti and ATI Radeon HD 5770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 34.0 GTexel / s
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 1,360.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 1345
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 335
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.168 vs 9.373
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 vs 459.025
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 vs 0.906
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.29 vs 27.022
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 2636
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 2673
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2799
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 2636
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 2673
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2799

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5770

• Around 4% higher pipelines: 800 vs 768
• Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 108 Watt vs 110 Watt
• 960x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10495 vs 7900
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 48.793 vs 47.404

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2527 1345
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	416 335
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7900 10495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.168 9.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	592.345 459.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.141 0.906
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.29 27.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	47.404 48.793
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3948 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3707 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3335 2799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3948 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3707 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3335 2799

Compare specifications (specs)