NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 360 MHz
- 20.6x more texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 2.88 GTexel / s
- 48x more pipelines: 768 vs 16
- 61.8x better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 23.04 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 30.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2533 vs 84
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 vs 385
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 628
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 628
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 9 October 2012 vs 12 September 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz vs 360 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec vs 2.88 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops vs 23.04 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2533 vs 84 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 vs 385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 vs 628 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 200x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 110 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2533 | 84 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 | 385 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7902 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 628 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK106 | G84 |
| Launch date | 9 October 2012 | 12 September 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $129 |
| Place in performance rating | 860 | 861 |
| Price now | $169.99 | $92.75 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 18.72 | 1.17 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 360 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops | 23.04 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec | 2.88 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... | 2x DVI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 198 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1450
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
AMDFirePro M6100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
