NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs ATI Radeon HD 5830
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti and ATI Radeon HD 5830 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 44.8 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1120
- Around 37% better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,792.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4407 vs 1734
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 461 vs 399
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 August 2012 vs 25 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 44.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 1120 |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,792.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4407 vs 1734 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 vs 399 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5830
- 666.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5830
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 5830 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4407 | 1734 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 | 399 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15191 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.001 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1616 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 5830 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK104 | Cypress |
Launch date | 16 August 2012 | 25 February 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Place in performance rating | 734 | 537 |
Price now | $321.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | 800 MHz |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 800 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | 1,792.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 1120 |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec | 44.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 282 mm |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity |