NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs ATI Radeon HD 4770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti and ATI Radeon HD 4770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 1344 vs 640
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 960.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4407 vs 908
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 461 vs 120
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 August 2012 vs 28 April 2009 |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 960.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4407 vs 908 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 vs 120 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4770
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 533.3x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8618 vs 3337
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8618 vs 3337
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8618 vs 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8618 vs 3337 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4770
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 4770 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4407 | 908 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 | 120 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15191 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.001 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 8618 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 8618 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1616 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 4770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | RV740 |
Launch date | 16 August 2012 | 28 April 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $109 |
Place in performance rating | 736 | 739 |
Price now | $321.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 750 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | 960.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 826 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 203 mm |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |