NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 81% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 18.1x more texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 120x more pipelines: 960 vs 8
- 95.2x better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 36.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 111
- 11.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 43
- 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 494
- 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 494
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 September 2012 vs 7 May 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 540 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 vs 111 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 43 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 494 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
- 6.1x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 231.7x more memory clock speed: 1390 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 140 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1390 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 | 111 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 43 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | 494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 | 494 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK106 | G98 |
| Launch date | 6 September 2012 | 7 May 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $54.50 |
| Place in performance rating | 740 | 1676 |
| Price now | $349.99 | $49.75 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | 2.51 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 540 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops | 20.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 960 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec | 4.32 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 11.12 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1390 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
ATIRadeon E4690
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
