NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M vs ATI FirePro M7820

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M and ATI FirePro M7820 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 835 MHz vs 700 MHz
• Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 30.4 billion / sec vs 28 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.837 vs 4.956
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.098 vs 0.869
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.798 vs 21.146

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro M7820

• 2.1x more pipelines: 800 vs 384
• Around 54% better floating-point performance: 1,120.0 gflops vs 729.6 gflops
• 2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15792 vs 3984
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 600.944 vs 405.086
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.902 vs 33.754
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2709 vs 2253
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2709 vs 2253

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
GPU 2: ATI FirePro M7820

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3984 15792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.837 4.956
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	405.086 600.944
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.098 0.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.798 21.146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.754 103.902
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2253 2709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2253 2709

Compare specifications (specs)