NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 160 Watt
• Around 99% higher maximum memory size: 1526 MB vs 768 MB
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 27.222
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 52.899 vs 40.61

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 598 MHz
• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 37.8 GTexel / s vs 33.5 billion / sec
• Around 13% better floating-point performance: 907.2 gflops vs 803.7 gflops
• 2.4x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2272 vs 1745
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 388 vs 307
• Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7860 vs 6497
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.445 vs 15.053
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 617.847 vs 588.645
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.823 vs 1.72
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3351 vs 2731
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3627
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3351 vs 2731
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3627

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1745 2272
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	307 388
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6497 7860
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.053 21.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	588.645 617.847
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.72 1.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.916 27.222
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.899 40.61
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2731 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3627 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2731 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3627 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3356

Compare specifications (specs)