NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Around 99% higher maximum memory size: 1526 MB vs 768 MB
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 27.222
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 52.899 vs 40.61
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 12 July 2010 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1526 MB vs 768 MB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 vs 27.222 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 vs 40.61 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 598 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 37.8 GTexel / s vs 33.5 billion / sec
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 907.2 gflops vs 803.7 gflops
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2266 vs 1745
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 307
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7850 vs 6486
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.445 vs 15.053
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 617.847 vs 588.645
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.823 vs 1.72
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3351 vs 2731
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3627
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3351 vs 2731
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3627
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 598 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s vs 33.5 billion / sec |
Floating-point performance | 907.2 gflops vs 803.7 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2266 vs 1745 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7850 vs 6486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.445 vs 15.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 617.847 vs 588.645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.823 vs 1.72 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3351 vs 2731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3351 vs 2731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1745 | 2266 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 385 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6486 | 7850 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.053 | 21.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.645 | 617.847 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.72 | 1.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 | 27.222 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 | 40.61 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2731 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2731 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2062 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF114 | GF104 |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 12 July 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 943 | 945 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 675 MHz |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 907.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion / sec | 37.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | 2-way |
Height | 4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1526 MB | 768 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
SLI |