NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 2.5x more pipelines: 960 vs 384
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 170 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 665.068 vs 539.966
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.241 vs 35.841

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 600 MHz
• Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec
• Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,263.4 gflops vs 1,256 gflops
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3038 vs 2745
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 425 vs 382
• Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11002 vs 10766
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.935 vs 18.251
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.344 vs 1.9
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 64.308 vs 62.895
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3383
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3383

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2745 3038
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	382 425
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10766 11002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.251 31.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	665.068 539.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.9 2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.241 35.841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	62.895 64.308
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4175 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3383 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4175 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3383 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3333

Compare specifications (specs)