NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 384
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 70% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 170 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 665.068 versus 539.966
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.241 versus 35.841
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2012 versus 25 January 2011 |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 384 |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 170 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 665.068 versus 539.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 versus 35.841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 versus 3333 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- Environ 37% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 10% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 52.7 GTexel / s versus 48.0 billion / sec
- Environ 1% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,263.4 gflops versus 1,256 gflops
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4008 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3038 versus 2745
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 424 versus 382
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11009 versus 10780
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.935 versus 18.251
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.344 versus 1.9
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 64.308 versus 62.895
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3383
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3383
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 600 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.7 GTexel / s versus 48.0 billion / sec |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,263.4 gflops versus 1,256 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3038 versus 2745 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 424 versus 382 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11009 versus 10780 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.935 versus 18.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.344 versus 1.9 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.308 versus 62.895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4184 versus 4175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4184 versus 4175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3383 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2745 | 3038 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 | 424 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10780 | 11009 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.251 | 31.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 665.068 | 539.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.9 | 2.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 | 35.841 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.895 | 64.308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 | 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3383 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 | 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3383 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 389 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2012 | 25 January 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 819 | 822 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Prix maintenant | $138 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.88 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,256 gflops | 1,263.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 960 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48.0 billion / sec | 52.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 115.2 GB / s | 128.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670MX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
