NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1006 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 84% higher boost clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 9.3x more texture fill rate: 128.8 billion / sec vs 13.8 GTexel / s
- 64x more pipelines: 1536 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2048 MB vs 512 MB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 18.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5590 vs 306
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 531 vs 309
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 1 March 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1006 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 128.8 billion / sec vs 13.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 24 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2048 MB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 vs 306 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 531 vs 309 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 195 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 195 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 | 306 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 531 | 309 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18376 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.086 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.645 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.577 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7222 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7222 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2004 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Curie |
| Code name | GK104 | G71 |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 1 March 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $99.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 544 | 545 |
| Price now | $579.99 | $99.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.83 | 3.97 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1058 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1006 MHz | 575 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,090.4 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 24 |
| Texture fill rate | 128.8 billion / sec | 13.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 195 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-III |
| Length | 10.0" (25.4 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2048 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256-bit GDDR5 | 700 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
