NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 80.6 billion / sec vs 48.2 billion / sec
  • 5.6x more pipelines: 1344 vs 240
  • 3.3x better floating-point performance: 2,038 gflops vs 622.1 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 236 Watt
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 63% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1107 MHz
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3239 vs 1299
  • 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 343 vs 62
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 4 June 2012 vs 16 June 2008
Texture fill rate 80.6 billion / sec vs 48.2 billion / sec
Pipelines 1344 vs 240
Floating-point performance 2,038 gflops vs 622.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 236 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1107 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3239 vs 1299
PassMark - G2D Mark 343 vs 62

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

  • Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1296 MHz vs 720 MHz
  • 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21396 vs 9345
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2697 vs 2409
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 3111
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2697 vs 2409
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 3111
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1296 MHz vs 720 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 21396 vs 9345
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2697 vs 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3325 vs 3111
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2697 vs 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3325 vs 3111

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3239
1299
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
343
62
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
9345
21396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2409
2697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3111
3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2409
2697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3111
3325
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
PassMark - G3D Mark 3239 1299
PassMark - G2D Mark 343 62
Geekbench - OpenCL 9345 21396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 28.081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 879.575
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 40.155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 99.75
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2409 2697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3111 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2409 2697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3111 3325
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Tesla 2.0
Code name GK104 GT200
Launch date 4 June 2012 16 June 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $310.50 $649
Place in performance rating 1060 1062
Price now $499.99 $522.78
Type Laptop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 8.46 2.98

Technical info

Boost clock speed 758 MHz
Core clock speed 720 MHz 1296 MHz
CUDA cores 1344 240
Floating-point performance 2,038 gflops 622.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 1344 240
Texture fill rate 80.6 billion / sec 48.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 236 Watt
Transistor count 3,540 million 1,400 million
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
SLI options 2-way 2-way3-way
Supplementary power connectors None 6-pin & 8-pin
Height 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)

API support

DirectX 12 API 10.0
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 115.2 GB / s 141.7 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1107 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
SLI
TXAA