Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 758 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 346
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 vs 28.081
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 vs 1263
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3111
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 vs 1263
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3111

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 28x more pipelines: 1344 vs 48
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3216 vs 1733
• Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10446 vs 7361
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 879.575 vs 465.116
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.823 vs 2.796
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.155 vs 29.115
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.75 vs 54.932
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2409 vs 1884
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2409 vs 1884

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 3216
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	363 346
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7361 10446
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.109 28.081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	465.116 879.575
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.796 2.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.115 40.155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.932 99.75
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2780 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1884 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2780 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1884 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3111

Compare specifications (specs)