NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 18% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 720 MHz
  • Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 863 MHz vs 758 MHz
  • Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 1263
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 2409
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3111
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 1263
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 2409
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3111
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 May 2013 vs 4 June 2012
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 720 MHz
Boost clock speed 863 MHz vs 758 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3188 vs 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3275 vs 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3333 vs 3111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3188 vs 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3275 vs 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3333 vs 3111

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

  • Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 80.6 billion / sec vs 55.23 GTexel / s
  • Around 75% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 768
  • Around 54% better floating-point performance: 2,038 gflops vs 1,326 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3239 vs 1998
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 343 vs 289
  • Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9406 vs 7240
  • 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.081 vs 8.832
  • Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 879.575 vs 520.747
  • 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.823 vs 0.731
  • 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.155 vs 19.952
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.75 vs 43.535
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 80.6 billion / sec vs 55.23 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1344 vs 768
Floating-point performance 2,038 gflops vs 1,326 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3239 vs 1998
PassMark - G2D Mark 343 vs 289
Geekbench - OpenCL 9406 vs 7240
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 28.081 vs 8.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 879.575 vs 520.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.823 vs 0.731
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 40.155 vs 19.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 99.75 vs 43.535

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1998
3239
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
289
343
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7240
9406
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.832
28.081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
520.747
879.575
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.731
2.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.952
40.155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
43.535
99.75
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3188
1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3275
2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3333
3111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3188
1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3275
2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3333
3111
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1998 3239
PassMark - G2D Mark 289 343
Geekbench - OpenCL 7240 9406
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.832 28.081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 520.747 879.575
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.731 2.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.952 40.155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 43.535 99.75
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3188 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3275 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3333 3111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3188 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3275 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3333 3111
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 759 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Kepler
Code name GK106 GK104
Launch date 30 May 2013 4 June 2012
Place in performance rating 1060 1061
Type Laptop Laptop
Launch price (MSRP) $310.50
Price now $499.99
Value for money (0-100) 8.46

Technical info

Boost clock speed 863 MHz 758 MHz
Core clock speed 850 MHz 720 MHz
CUDA cores 768 1344
Floating-point performance 1,326 gflops 2,038 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 1344
Texture fill rate 55.23 GTexel / s 80.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 2,540 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 PCI Express 3.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0) MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size large large
SLI options 1 2-way
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 API 12 API
OpenCL 1.1 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 64.0 GB / s 115.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA
Verde Drivers
Adaptive VSync
DirectX 11 DirectX 11