NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 720 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 863 MHz vs 758 MHz
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 1263
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 2409
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3111
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 1263
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 2409
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3111
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 vs 4 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 863 MHz vs 758 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 vs 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 vs 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 vs 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 vs 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 3111 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 80.6 billion / sec vs 55.23 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 768
- Around 54% better floating-point performance: 2,038 gflops vs 1,326 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3239 vs 1998
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 343 vs 289
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9778 vs 7244
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.081 vs 8.832
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 879.575 vs 520.747
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.823 vs 0.731
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.155 vs 19.952
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.75 vs 43.535
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 80.6 billion / sec vs 55.23 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops vs 1,326 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3239 vs 1998 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 vs 289 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9778 vs 7244 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.081 vs 8.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 879.575 vs 520.747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.823 vs 0.731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.155 vs 19.952 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.75 vs 43.535 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1998 | 3239 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 | 343 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7244 | 9778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.832 | 28.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 | 879.575 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.731 | 2.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.952 | 40.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.535 | 99.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 | 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 | 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 | 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 | 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3111 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK106 | GK104 |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 | 4 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1059 | 1060 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $310.50 | |
Price now | $499.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 863 MHz | 758 MHz |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 720 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | 1344 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops | 2,038 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 GTexel / s | 80.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | large |
SLI options | 1 | 2-way |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |