NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 720 MHz
• Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 758 MHz
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 vs 28.081
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 vs 99.75
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2796 vs 1263
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 2409
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3111
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2796 vs 1263
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 2409
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3111

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

• 2.7x more texture fill rate: 80.6 billion / sec vs 29.81 GTexel / s
• 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,038 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3239 vs 1834
• Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 343 vs 196
• Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9345 vs 6495
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 879.575 vs 406.203
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.823 vs 2.034
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.155 vs 30.251

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1834 3239
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	196 343
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6495 9345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.613 28.081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	406.203 879.575
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.034 2.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.251 40.155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	107.608 99.75
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3111

Compare specifications (specs)