NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX and ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 14.4x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- 12.8x more pipelines: 1536 vs 120
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 2200 MHz
- 14.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4138 vs 283
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 534 vs 371
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 1701
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 1701
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 October 2012 vs 28 June 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 120 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 2200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4138 vs 283 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 534 vs 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 1701 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 720 MHz
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 3571
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 3571
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 720 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 3571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 3571 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4138 | 283 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 534 | 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12178 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.421 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 734.936 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.31 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.434 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3571 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3571 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 1701 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Launch date | 23 October 2012 | 28 June 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 650 | 651 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Code name | RV630 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 800 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 120 |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec | 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3540 Million | 390 million |
| Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 35.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 280 PCI
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX vs
ATIRadeon X600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX vs
AMDRadeon R7 260X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX vs
AMDFirePro M5100
