Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 122 Watt
| Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 23 October 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 8.9x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 38.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 40
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4138 vs 1186
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 534 vs 394
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5683 vs 2095
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5683 vs 2095
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12178 vs 5053
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3571 vs 3285
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3571 vs 3285
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 40 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4138 vs 1186 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 534 vs 394 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5683 vs 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5683 vs 2095 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12178 vs 5053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3571 vs 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3571 vs 3285 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1186 | 4138 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 | 534 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2095 | 5683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2095 | 5683 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5053 | 12178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 | 3571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 | 3571 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.421 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 734.936 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.31 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.434 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Kepler |
| Code name | Haswell GT3e | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 23 October 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 649 | 650 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 40 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 10.4 GTexel / s | 92.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 3540 Million |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 with others
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200 vs
ATIRadeon X600 XT
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 XT
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200 vs
AMDRadeon R7 260X
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200 vs
AMDFirePro M5100
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200 vs
AMDFirePro W5100
