NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX vs ATI Radeon HD 5970
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX and ATI Radeon HD 5970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4142 vs 2301
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 589 vs 419
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5683 vs 3977
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3571 vs 3454
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3213
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5683 vs 3977
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3571 vs 3454
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3213
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 October 2012 vs 18 November 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4142 vs 2301 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 vs 419 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5683 vs 3977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3571 vs 3454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 3213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5683 vs 3977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3571 vs 3454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 3213 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5970
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 720 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 92.2 billion / sec
- 2.1x more pipelines: 2x 1600 vs 1536
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 92.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 1600 vs 1536 |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5970
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | ATI Radeon HD 5970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4142 | 2301 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | 419 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12188 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.421 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 734.936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.31 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.434 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5683 | 3977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3571 | 3454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5683 | 3977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3571 | 3454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3213 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | ATI Radeon HD 5970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Launch date | 23 October 2012 | 18 November 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 613 | 604 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Code name | Hemlock | |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 725 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2x 1600 |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec | 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 3540 Million | 2,154 million |
Boost clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,320.0 gflops | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 305 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 2x 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA |