NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti versus AMD Radeon HD 6950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 6950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 36% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 8.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 500 Watt
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3899 versus 2605
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 versus 440
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11514 versus 6105
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 16.999
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 versus 1.659
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 versus 3652
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 2523
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 versus 3652
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 2523
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 14 December 2010 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 500 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3899 versus 2605 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 versus 440 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11514 versus 6105 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 16.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 versus 1.659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 2523 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6950
- Environ 62% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 70.4 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 1408 versus 640
- Environ 62% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,252.8 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
- 250x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1250 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 899.056 versus 642.715
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.698 versus 26.532
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 251.203 versus 133.458
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11657 versus 3329
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11657 versus 3329
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 70.4 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1408 versus 640 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,252.8 gflops versus 1,389 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 899.056 versus 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.698 versus 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.203 versus 133.458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11657 versus 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11657 versus 3329 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6950
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6950 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3899 | 2605 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | 440 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11514 | 6105 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 16.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 899.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 1.659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 49.698 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 251.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 11657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 11657 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1265 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
Nom de code | GM107 | Cayman |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 14 December 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 712 | 713 |
Prix maintenant | $299.01 | $89.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | 45.34 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 800 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | 2,252.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1408 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | 70.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 500 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 2,640 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | 1250 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |