NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 10.3x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 40x more pipelines: 640 vs 16
• 41.3x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• 11.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 347
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 194
• 21.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 538
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 8.712
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 155.638
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 0.931
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 7.36
• 11.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 12.009
• 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 754
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1492
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2392
• 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 754
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1492
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 60 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3901 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	521 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11526 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.463 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	642.715 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.933 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.532 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	133.458 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4843 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4843 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 2392

Compare specifications (specs)