NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce 210

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
10.4x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
40x more pipelines: 640 vs 16
35.3x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
31x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 126
17.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 30
4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 2438
7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 497
4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 688
7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 497
4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 688

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 February 2014 vs 12 October 2009
Texture fill rate	43.4 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 16
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3901 vs 126
PassMark - G2D Mark	521 vs 30
Geekbench - OpenCL	11526 vs 2438
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 vs 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329 vs 688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 vs 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329 vs 688

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210

Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 30.5 Watt vs 60 Watt
100x more memory clock speed: 500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s

Core clock speed	1402 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30.5 Watt vs 60 Watt
Memory clock speed	500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3901

126

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

521

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11526

2438

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3683

497

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

688

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3683

497

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

688

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce 210
PassMark - G3D Mark	3901	126
PassMark - G2D Mark	521	30
Geekbench - OpenCL	11526	2438
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683	497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329	688
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683	497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329	688
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	117

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce 210
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GM107	GT218
Launch date	18 February 2014	12 October 2009
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	$29.49
Place in performance rating	707	1674
Price now	$299.01	$32.99
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	15.02	6.81
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	1020 MHz	1402 MHz
CUDA cores	640	16
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops	39.36 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	640	16
Texture fill rate	43.4 GTexel / s	4.16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	30.5 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	260 million
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	Internal
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	PCI-E 2.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	2.731" (6.9 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	6.60" (16.8 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.1
OpenGL	4.4	3.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB / s	8.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5.4 GB/s	500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR2
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA