NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 823 MHz
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 10% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 170 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 3063
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 438
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 10721
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 31.935
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 539.966
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 2.344
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 64.308
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 4184
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 4184

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

• Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• 801.6x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.841 vs 26.532
• 3.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 389 vs 117

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3901 3063
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	521 438
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11526 10721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.463 31.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	642.715 539.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.933 2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.532 35.841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	133.458 64.308
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4843 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4843 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	117 389

Compare specifications (specs)