NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 915 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 980 MHz
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 517 versus 466
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 36.256
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 versus 82.191
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 versus 3285
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 versus 3285
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 16 August 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 915 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 versus 466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 versus 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 versus 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 versus 3285 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.5 billion / sec versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 640
- Environ 77% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,459.5 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
- Environ 20% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6.0 GB/s versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4411 versus 3898
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15349 versus 11512
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 versus 642.715
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.037 versus 2.933
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 versus 26.532
- 13.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1615 versus 116
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.5 billion / sec versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 versus 640 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,459.5 gflops versus 1,389 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s versus 5.4 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4411 versus 3898 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15349 versus 11512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 versus 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 versus 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 versus 26.532 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1615 versus 116 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3898 | 4411 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 | 466 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11512 | 15349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 116 | 1615 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 16 August 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 726 | 727 |
Prix maintenant | $299.01 | $321.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | 17.34 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 980 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 915 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | 1344 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1344 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | 6.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
SLI |