NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 6 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 11% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1020 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Etwa 11% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1085 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 2.5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 468
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 36.256
- Etwa 62% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 82.191
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 3285
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 3285
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 18 February 2014 vs 16 August 2012 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1020 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1085 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 3285 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- 2.4x mehr Texturfüllrate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- 2.1x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1344 vs 640
- Etwa 77% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- Etwa 20% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 6.0 GB/s vs 5.4 GB/s
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4413 vs 3901
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15375 vs 11526
- Etwa 60% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 642.715
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.037 vs 2.933
- Etwa 73% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 26.532
- 13.8x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1615 vs 117
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 1344 vs 640 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 6.0 GB/s vs 5.4 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4413 vs 3901 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15375 vs 11526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 vs 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 vs 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 vs 26.532 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1615 vs 117 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | 15375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 | 1615 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Maxwell | Kepler |
Codename | GM107 | GK104 |
Startdatum | 18 February 2014 | 16 August 2012 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $149 | $299 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 707 | 701 |
Jetzt kaufen | $299.01 | $321.99 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 15.02 | 17.34 |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1085 MHz | 980 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1020 MHz | 915 MHz |
CUDA-Kerne | 640 | 1344 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,389 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 640 | 1344 |
Texturfüllrate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt | 150 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display-Anschlüsse | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | Two 6-pin |
SLI-Optionen | 3-way | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 86.4 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5.4 GB/s | 6.0 GB/s |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
SLI |