NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 38.4 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
- 3x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 108 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 825
- 10.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 49
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3258
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3258
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 30 March 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 38.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 462.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 108 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 825 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 3258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 3258 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
- 320x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13337 vs 11526
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13337 vs 11526 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | 825 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 49 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | 13337 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3258 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | GT200B |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 30 March 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $799 |
| Place in performance rating | 707 | 1363 |
| Price now | $299.01 | $109.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | 9.89 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 38.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 198 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDFirePro S7100X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 555
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100
