NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 706 MHz
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 122 Watt
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 517 vs 433
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11520 vs 11459
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 31.318
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 67.311

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000

• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 90.37 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
• Around 56% better floating-point performance: 2,169 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 1080x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3998 vs 3900
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 681.141 vs 642.715
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.062 vs 2.933
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.922 vs 26.532
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6288 vs 4843
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3329
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6288 vs 4843
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3329
• Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1351 vs 1268

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3900 3998
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	517 433
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11520 11459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.463 31.318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	642.715 681.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.933 3.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.532 32.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	133.458 67.311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4843 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4843 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 3352
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1268 1351

Compare specifications (specs)