NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti versus NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 44% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 706 MHz
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 517 versus 433
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11520 versus 11459
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 31.318
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 versus 67.311
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 17 August 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 706 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 versus 433 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11520 versus 11459 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 31.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 versus 67.311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3680 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5000
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 90.37 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 640
- Environ 56% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,169 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 1080x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3998 versus 3900
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 681.141 versus 642.715
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.062 versus 2.933
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.922 versus 26.532
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6288 versus 4843
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 3329
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6288 versus 4843
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 3329
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1351 versus 1268
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 90.37 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,169 gflops versus 1,389 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3998 versus 3900 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 681.141 versus 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.062 versus 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.922 versus 26.532 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6288 versus 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6288 versus 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1351 versus 1268 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3900 | 3998 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 | 433 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11520 | 11459 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 31.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 681.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 3.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 32.922 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 67.311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 6288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 6288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1268 | 1351 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 17 August 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $2,499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 705 | 708 |
| Prix maintenant | $299.01 | $1,950 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | 2.47 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | 2,169 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | 90.37 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | 172.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | 5400 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 8950 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
