NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs ATI Radeon HD 4770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and ATI Radeon HD 4770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,111 gflops vs 960.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 80 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3344 vs 910
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 508 vs 114
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 28 April 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 750 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops vs 960.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 80 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3344 vs 910 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 vs 114 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4770
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- 640x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8618 vs 3346
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8618 vs 3346
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8618 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8618 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | ATI Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3344 | 910 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 | 114 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9266 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 8618 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 8618 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1049 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | ATI Radeon HD 4770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM107 | RV740 |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 28 April 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | $109 |
| Place in performance rating | 755 | 753 |
| Price now | $150.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 750 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | 960.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 826 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 203 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4770
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
