NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs ATI Radeon HD 4770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and ATI Radeon HD 4770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,111 gflops vs 960.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 80 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3349 vs 910
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 507 vs 114
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 28 April 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops vs 960.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3349 vs 910 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 507 vs 114 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4770
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- 640x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8618 vs 3346
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8618 vs 3346
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8618 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8618 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4770
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | ATI Radeon HD 4770 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3349 | 910 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 507 | 114 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9257 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 8618 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 8618 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1049 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | ATI Radeon HD 4770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM107 | RV740 |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 28 April 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | $109 |
Place in performance rating | 756 | 754 |
Price now | $150.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 750 MHz |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | 960.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 826 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 203 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |