NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,111 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 238 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3347 vs 3121
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 507 vs 462
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 vs 26.223
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 3245
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 3245
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 238 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3347 vs 3121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 507 vs 462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 vs 26.223 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 vs 3245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 vs 3245 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 600x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9716 vs 9266
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 908.754 vs 639.427
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.015 vs 2.341
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.519 vs 32
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 93.344 vs 69.814
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9716 vs 9266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 908.754 vs 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.015 vs 2.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.519 vs 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.344 vs 69.814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3347 | 3121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 507 | 462 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9266 | 9716 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 26.223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 908.754 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 3.015 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 43.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | 93.344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | 3245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | 3245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1049 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM107 | GF100 |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | |
Place in performance rating | 755 | 757 |
Price now | $150.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 575 MHz |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 238 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 1x DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 248 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 144.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |