NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,111 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 238 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3344 vs 3121
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 508 vs 462
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 vs 26.223
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 3245
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 3245
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 25 July 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 448 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 238 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3344 vs 3121 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 vs 462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 vs 26.223 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 vs 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 vs 3245 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 600x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9716 vs 9266
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 908.754 vs 639.427
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.015 vs 2.341
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.519 vs 32
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 93.344 vs 69.814
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9716 vs 9266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 908.754 vs 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.015 vs 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.519 vs 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.344 vs 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3344 | 3121 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 | 462 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9266 | 9716 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 26.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 908.754 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 3.015 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 43.519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | 93.344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1049 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | GM107 | GF100 |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | |
| Place in performance rating | 755 | 757 |
| Price now | $150.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 575 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 1x DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 248 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 144.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 3000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4770
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
