NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and ATI Radeon HD 4850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- Around 11% better floating-point performance: 1,111 gflops vs 1,000.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 vs 941
- 6.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 75
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 25 June 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops vs 1,000.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 110 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 vs 941 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 vs 75 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3344 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4850
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 800 vs 512
- 397.2x more memory clock speed: 1986 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
| Pipelines | 800 vs 512 |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | ATI Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | 941 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | 75 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3344 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | ATI Radeon HD 4850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM107 | RV770 |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 25 June 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | $199 |
| Place in performance rating | 724 | 1288 |
| Price now | $150.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 625 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | 1,000.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 246 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 63.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 1986 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIFireGL V5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6150
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1800
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8870M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
