NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 915 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 1019 MHz
- 5.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 511 versus 465
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 versus 29.836
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 1849
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 1673
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 1849
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 1673
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 3 May 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 915 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 1019 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 511 versus 465 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 versus 29.836 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 1673 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 234 billion / sec versus 34.72 GTexel / s
- 6x plus de pipelines: 2x 1536 versus 512
- 5.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 3,130 gflops versus 1,111 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 versus 1 GB
- 1201.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5491 versus 3342
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16577 versus 9284
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.352 versus 34.239
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.114 versus 639.427
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.656 versus 2.341
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.861 versus 69.814
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6875 versus 4498
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6875 versus 4498
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 234 billion / sec versus 34.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 3,130 gflops versus 1,111 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5491 versus 3342 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16577 versus 9284 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 versus 34.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.114 versus 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 versus 2.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 versus 69.814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 versus 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 versus 4498 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3342 | 5491 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 511 | 465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9284 | 16577 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 46.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 930.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 3.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 29.836 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | 97.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | 6875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | 6875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 1673 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 3 May 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 749 | 751 |
Prix maintenant | $150.99 | $999 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.54 | 7.01 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 1019 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 915 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 512 | 3072 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,111 gflops | 2x 3,130 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 512 | 2x 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s | 234 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 11.0" (27.9 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 8-pin |
Options SLI | Quad | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 384 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI |