AMD Radeon RX 560D vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560D and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 65.8 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
- Around 90% better floating-point performance: 2,106 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 1200x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 July 2017 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops vs 1,111 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3346 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 65 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3346 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 4 July 2017 | 18 February 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | $119 |
| Place in performance rating | 744 | 747 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $150.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops | 1,111 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,870 million |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 560D with others
AMDRadeon RX 560D vs
ATIFireGL V3200
AMDRadeon RX 560D vs
ATIRadeon X1300
AMDRadeon RX 560D vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750
AMDRadeon RX 560D vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580
AMDRadeon RX 560D vs
AMDFirePro S7100X
AMDRadeon RX 560D vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 XT
