NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 vs 26.532
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3329
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3329
- 9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1050 vs 117
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 vs 26.532 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 vs 117 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 3337
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 515
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 9306
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 34.239
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 639.427
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 2.341
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 69.814
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 4498
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 4498
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 1,111 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 3337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 515 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 9306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 34.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 vs 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 vs 2.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 69.814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 4498 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | 3901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | 521 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 | 11526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | 133.458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM107 | GM107 |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | $149 |
Place in performance rating | 724 | 707 |
Price now | $150.99 | $299.01 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | 15.02 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1020 MHz |
CUDA cores | 512 | 640 |
Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
GeForce Experience |