NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 60 Watt
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 versus 26.532
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 3329
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 3329
- 9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1050 versus 117
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 60 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 versus 26.532 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 versus 117 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Environ 25% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 43.4 GTexel / s versus 34.72 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 512
- Environ 25% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,389 gflops versus 1,111 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 versus 3337
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 versus 515
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 versus 9306
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 34.239
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 versus 639.427
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 versus 2.341
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 versus 69.814
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 versus 4498
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 versus 4498
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s versus 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops versus 1,111 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 versus 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 versus 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 versus 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 versus 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 versus 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 versus 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 versus 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 versus 4498 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | 3901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | 521 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 | 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 | 117 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | $149 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 724 | 707 |
| Prix maintenant | $150.99 | $299.01 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.54 | 15.02 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 512 | 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,111 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | 5.4 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIFireGL V5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6150
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1800
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8870M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
