NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 89.6 GTexel / s
- Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3699
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3699
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 vs 31 January 2012 |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3699 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1152
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 2,378 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 vs 14261
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.74 vs 37.505
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1177.395 vs 864.402
- Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.685 vs 3.09
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 69.23 vs 40.457
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 vs 84.186
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 vs 6927
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 vs 6927
- Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1914 vs 1659
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 1152 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops vs 2,378 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 vs 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 vs 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 vs 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 vs 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.23 vs 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 vs 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 vs 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 vs 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 vs 1659 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 | 82144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 | 63.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 | 1177.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 | 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 | 69.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 | 343.81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 | 1914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 31 January 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | $449 |
| Place in performance rating | 576 | 503 |
| Price now | $249.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1152 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 1792 |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec | 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 4,313 million |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 267 mm |
| Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4730
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIATesla C2050
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIATesla K40m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M290X
