NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 384
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 652.8 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 vs 1202
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 239
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14261 vs 3802
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.505 vs 9.947
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 vs 340.824
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.09 vs 0.982
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.457 vs 18.773
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.186 vs 23.111
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 2283
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3299
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1913
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 2283
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3299
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1913
- 4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 vs 414
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 vs 22 March 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops vs 652.8 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 vs 1202 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 239 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 vs 3802 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 vs 9.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 vs 340.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 vs 0.982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 vs 18.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 vs 23.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 vs 2283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 vs 2283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1913 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 vs 414 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 170 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 | 1202 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | 239 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 | 3802 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 | 9.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 | 340.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 | 0.982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 | 18.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 | 23.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 | 2283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 | 2283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1913 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 | 414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Place in performance rating | 576 | 1188 |
| Price now | $249.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1152 | 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops | 652.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4730
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIATesla C2050
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIATesla K40m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M290X
