NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1033 MHz versus 950 MHz
- 3x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 384
- 3.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,378 gflops versus 652.8 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 3.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 versus 1202
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 versus 239
- 3.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14261 versus 3802
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.505 versus 9.947
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 versus 340.824
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.09 versus 0.982
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.457 versus 18.773
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.186 versus 23.111
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 versus 2283
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3299
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 1913
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 versus 2283
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3299
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 1913
- 4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 versus 414
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 25 June 2013 versus 22 March 2012 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz versus 950 MHz |
Pipelines | 1152 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,378 gflops versus 652.8 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 versus 1202 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 versus 239 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 versus 3802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 versus 9.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 versus 340.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 versus 0.982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 versus 18.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 versus 23.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 versus 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 versus 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 1913 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 versus 414 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- 3.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 170 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 170 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 | 1202 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | 239 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 | 3802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 | 9.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 | 340.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 | 0.982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 | 18.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 | 23.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 | 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 | 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1913 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 | 414 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK104 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 25 June 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 576 | 1188 |
Prix maintenant | $249.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | 950 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 1152 | 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,378 gflops | 652.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 1152 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 94.1 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 500 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |