NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M versus NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and NVIDIA Tesla M2050 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 657 MHz versus 575 MHz
- Environ 31% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 42.05 GTexel / s versus 32.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 71% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 448
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 4.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 225 Watt
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 versus 25 July 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 657 MHz versus 575 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42.05 GTexel / s versus 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 448 |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M2050
- Environ 2% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,030.4 gflops versus 1,009 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 55% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3092 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- 6.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 36584 versus 5605
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.848 versus 15.673
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 966.795 versus 509.958
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.15 versus 1.512
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 versus 30.422
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.318 versus 53.992
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,030.4 gflops versus 1,009 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3092 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36584 versus 5605 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.848 versus 15.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 966.795 versus 509.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.15 versus 1.512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 versus 30.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.318 versus 53.992 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2050
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | NVIDIA Tesla M2050 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1720 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5605 | 36584 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.673 | 23.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 | 966.795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.512 | 3.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 | 44.227 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.992 | 95.318 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2728 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2728 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | NVIDIA Tesla M2050 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK106 | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1127 | 1129 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,699 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 657 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 657 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,009 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42.05 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Longeur | 248 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.0 GB / s | 148.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 3092 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDRadeon E6760
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
NVIDIATesla M2050
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
IntelHD Graphics 6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M365X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX
