NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M vs AMD Radeon HD 6790

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M and AMD Radeon HD 6790 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 63.76 GTexel / s vs 33.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 960 vs 800
• Around 14% better floating-point performance: 1,530 gflops vs 1,344.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
• 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2798 vs 1619
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.528 vs 12.318
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.486 vs 1.234
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.15 vs 28.768
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4133 vs 3127
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 3534
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4133 vs 3127
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 3534

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6790

• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 840 MHz vs 811 MHz
• 2.1x more memory clock speed: 4200 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 373 vs 339
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.421 vs 731.755
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.423 vs 87.659
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3331
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3331

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6790

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2798 1619
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	339 373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.528 12.318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	731.755 750.421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.486 1.234
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.15 28.768
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.659 121.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4133 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3651 3534
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3331 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4133 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3651 3534
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3331 3350

Compare specifications (specs)